Brainloop
 
8. Direct Brain–Computer Communication
  8.3. Components of graz BCI
  8.3.1. Parameter Estimation and Classification
    8.3.1.4. Hidden Markov Model

The two classification methods based on autoregressive parameters or common spatial patterns classify the ongoing EEG in short windows where stationarity is assumed.
Dynamic EEG changes such as, for example, patterns of desynchronization cannot be modeled, and are therefore not considered for classification. To overcome the problem of nonstationarity, the hidden Markov models (HMMs) were introduced for modeling the dynamic EEG changes.

An HMM describes a first-order time domain process which is defined as a process where the conditional probability of the current event merely depends on the most recent event.
The HMM itself could be seen as a finite automate containing discrete states, emitting a feature vector at every time point.

 
8. Direct Brain–Computer Communication
  8.1. A short overview of EEG-based BCI systems
8.2. Neurophysiological considerations
  8.2.1. Dynamics of Brain Oscillations
8.2.2. Motor Imagery
8.3. Components of graz BCI
  8.3.1. Parameter Estimation and Classification
  8.3.1.1. Band Power Estimates
8.3.1.2. Adaptive Autoregressive Model
8.3.1.3. Common Spatial Patterns
8.3.1.4. Hidden Markov Model
8.3.2. Hardware–Software Requirements
  8.4. Man–Machine Learning Dilemma (MMLD)
  8.5. Visual target stimulus modifying the EEG
   

Source: Motor Imagery and Direct Brain–Computer Communication, Gert Pfurtscheller and Christa Neuper
 
 
  <back | aksioma